Same here. But we are not the norm. Many people understandably want single number answers because they are easier to handle.
That is why I chose simple sequence with outliers⊠I know the power/value of n
Which is why I will never trust anyone who quotes âstatisticsâ. Most folk will nod their heads without understanding the numbers.
This conversation is exactly why I donât introduce you guys to my other friends!
Occasional forum thread derailments are a fact of life.
Especially on here. It is a part of Mudspike forums culture.
Part of language is culture, and part of culture is life expectancy, so I think weâre right on track
Letâs face it, the longer you live, the more your language will change!
Or it will change around you.
Or others will change and you wonât.
Ad nauseum.
Î ÎÎ΀ΠΥÎÎ
Absolutely. Language is ever evolving. Thatâs what is so fascinating to me. Sometimes I am excited about how gaps in the lexicon get filled.
âŠOK, and sometimes I am not. You probably wonât see me use skibidi or much else of the current âGen Alpha (?) slangâ but at times the people come up with cool new words that Iâll adopt, even though it makes me the cringe old dude using slang words.
You misspelled Santa Fe. And thatâs not Santa Fe.
Language evolving to fill gaps is indeed fascinating. Already established words having their meanings changed, though, I have issues with. âThose who control the meaning of words, control the people who have to use them.â
I remember as a kid watching the Hindenburg newsreel for the first time. When the shocked, crying commentator called it a âterrific crashâ I thought âWow! What a mean guy!â The word âterrificâ had reversed meaning in just a generation.
Iâve never noticed âterrificâ having an absolute reversed meaning, but rather the meaning could be opposite depending on the context. Thereâs a few other words like that locked away somewhere in my brain but I havenât had my morning coffee yet.
It can, but is it used in the negative way, anymore? I use horrific instead. Terrific is a positive word, for meâŠ
Not sure about colloquial usage but the negative meaning is still listed in the dictionary.
Yes it does. But I donât think I have ever used terrific in a negative meaning, nor do I remember hearing it being used that wayâŠ
Iâm with @Troll
I had no idea that terrific (once) had that meaning⊠terrirfying would be what I would use.
I actually like the way that languages evolve over time⊠It allows me to â â â â (P) off all the Gen Zâs by using âgroovyâ a lot
Speaking of changing meanings of certain English words, I really would be curious to find out when the original meaning of the word âgayâ changed to its current meaning. Iâm also wondering if that change only happened in the US or if it changed in most English speaking countries.
I think it was in the 1970s when that movement really gathered steam in the wake of the civil rights movement.
I remember an episode of Barney Miller where one of the guest star cops actually admitted being gay to Barney after some incident or other.
I think Wojciehowicz (a name I to this day think is one of the best for any character) talking to Barney referred to him as a âmember of the opposite sexâ and Barney replying âthey prefer the term âgayâ.â
Quite possibly the earliest instance I recall on TV or film. It aired from 1975-82 and I donât think was at the very end, so maybe 79-80 or so?
I will further mention I have not seen that episode again since it originally aired 45 or so years ago, so Iâm surprised I still remember itâŠ