Mudspike Firearms


No Mudspike Firearms thread yet?! :wink:

Ok, I’ll start it off … the P90 … just look at it! …


The Five-seven pistol was developed in conjuntion with it! … take a gander at that! …


Always wishing you smooth transitions! :slight_smile:



As in favorite firearms or our personal arsenals collections? :smile:

Steyr AUG

H&K P2000

M1 & M1911A1

(I don’t think those two need any introductions!)



Without getting political, what is the fascination? I kind of scratch my head on that question. To me, a firearm is nothing more than a tool designed for a specific task. I don’t get excited over hammers, drills or wrenches, but maybe we need a power tool thread too? :wink:



Does this mean I can finally start my Mudspike Orchids thread? :tulip:



So is a fighter aircraft. :slight_smile:

1 Like


I don’t have any gun fascination either. But, I fully understand, people who like them. Despite his objective at the end it’s just a matter of personal interest/fascination just like cars, civil or military aircrafts, soccer, boats, subs, tanks, birds, women, etc.



I don’t see it as exactly the same thing. You also don’t see many privately owned, fully armed fighters.



We’re an aviation forum, mainly.

We don’t try to police/moderate for taste (half mine would be gone, for example) but just to the rules of not posting stuff that often leads to arguments or is a particularly divisive subject. Orchids don’t tend to polarize opinions, although people that like Phalaenopsis can go to hell.

A reminder for all that we do have good topic tools though. The button at the bottom of every topic can be flipped to keep all happy:




The price of one firearm against a functional jet… is frankly not a valid rebuttal

Can i just say, instead of hanging on thread that has no interest to you, perhaps we can be civil and get this thread back on track. We are not THAT OTHER SITE.

For me, i like firearms as a hobby. Used to do a bit of shooting back in oz and clay pidgeon shooting here in UK. Unfortunately, don’t get much of a chance lately. Pistol shooting i haven’t done much of, but i always wanted to get my hands on one of these. The reputation is quite good, though my pistol shooting skills would suck donkeys round things. Still want a go though.

1 Like


I wasn’t referring to the cost. More to the point that you are not allowed to own an armed fighter jet. Even that immaculate Sea Harrier isn’t allowed to be armed.

Anyway, I’ll butt out of the conversation at this point.

1 Like


This is obviously a very sensitive subject in light of the recent tragedy in Las Vegas, but I will try to answer the question.

Shooting probably satisfies some primal instinct to blast stuff. Can be a lot of fun too. Taken further, even if you don’t use a firearm for its intended purpose, there is the challenge of doing it proficiently and safely. Competive shooting is challenging and can be rewarding provided one has a competant coach or mentor and willing to put in enough range time.

On a personal level, dad flew fighters, and since the USAF theorized that clay pigeon shooting satisfied both skill practice and recreation needs, there was a skeet range at every base we were stationed. My brothers and I worked at them in high school on weekends and during Summer break.

Then there is hunting. In the Southeast USA where I grew up, it was sort of expected that you became proficient shooting quail, dove, and squirrel before you got pushed out of the nest. I had my first side-by-side 20 GA at 11 years old. Still have it. I would imagine boys from rural OH, PA, NY, or any number of States had the same experiences.

As Americans, we probably all imagine ourselves as just a few generations separated from Meriweather Lewis, Daniel Boone, or Jim Bridger. For better or worse, firearms are woven into the fabric of our origin and existence. Add 9/11, a strong firearms lobby, a bunch of Internet forums, YouTube, and very tolerant firearms laws in most states, you have a perfect storm for widespread firearm and ammo ownership.

1 Like


Depends on how much junk food you eat and then how long you hold it in. With the right kind of delivery system, you could probably make enough people wish they were dead!

But getting back on topic:

The P14 Enfield, later re-purposed as the M1917 in 30-06. In summary: the Mauser action introduced on the G1898 made a lot of militaries sit up and take notice. The US had already pretty much cloned the rifle in 1903, but the United Kingdom didn’t quite get there until a few years later, with the P13 Enfield. Originally made for a .276 caliber rimless cartridge, the outbreak of WW1 put a damper on adoption of the rifle and the cartridge. Rifles were rebuilt to P14 standard, chambered for the .303 cartridge, which was then manufactured by US firms for the UK. When the USA entered the war in 1917, there were not enough M1903 rifles available, so redesigning the P14 for 30-06 was quickly done in order to have a rifle available in quantity for the US military.



What now?



I just found out about the “Honey Badger” rifle when I loaded the Insurgency mod we’re currently playing with … VERY nice firearm (yes I know FPS Russia isn’t Russian :slight_smile: ) …



Just poking fun at how one could, in theory, arm an aircraft. The pilot could work up enough gas by eating either prunes, broccoli, or the day’s McSpecial Meal. From there, holding it in long enough, one only needs to figure out the proper delivery system and presto! Armed aircraft!

… I’ll stop now.



I detect German humor. :grin:





I share your love for the Steyr AUG Franze :slight_smile: … the memory of all the guards at Frankfurt Flughafen when I arrived there 35 years ago really left an imprint on me.



The Europeans really know how to make 5.56 rifles. Used to work with a guy who got some range time with the Bundeswehr in the mid-90s, right as they were transitioning to the G36; he said it was the sweetest shooting rifle he ever shot. He definitely didn’t think too highly of the MG3, though – but that’s only because he missed!