I lied. I hate them. I HATE THEM!
I hate them more!
Wonderful news and I am sure to add this to my āMig Collectionā, currently 15, 21, and 29. Plus I am fairly sure you can find on YouTube, Navy Ace Randy Cunningham (who I met years agoā¦before he went to prison) describe his encounter with and shoot down of a Mig-19, purportedly flown by NVAF ace Colonel Tombā¦all good Mig-19 stuff.
That said, I among others would really like to see a Mig-23 or Mig-27 ā¦really, really like to see.
MiG-23 for sure, but Iām a little sad that the 17 was passed over. While the 19 is a more interesting aircraft, the Fresco had almost 3 x the air victories as the Farmer. I remember my dad saying when he got back from Da Nang in ā68 that in no way should a Phantom engage a 17 in a turn fight. Seems obvious, but the little MiG was very much on his metaphorical radar at the time.
Perhaps that one can be reserved for a new development team looking for a starting aircraft to introduce.
In fact this one, the -19 is the ātrainerā for the team that is aiming to do the mighty flogger, the -23!
Yeah! What he said!
I too believe the Fresco deserves a place in DCS. It is without a doubt a big piece of 60s to 80s history. I like flying the '15 a lot. I imagine the '17 to just be better.
As mentioned above, sad to see it bypassed. But I did put my credit card on alert for the Farmer.
Iām sure the 17 will eventually be picked up to develop as a module. There are a still a lot of great aircraft that would be worthy additions to the DCS plane set.
A good point. There are āmainlineā (or maybe just āpopularā) aircraft like the F-15, F-16, FA-18 Mirage 2000, etc., on one side and Mig-21, Mig-29, Su-27 etc. on the other side. To date there are examples of all somewhere in DCS or planed for it.
Then there are the ānicheā aircraftā¦(with all due respect to @Troll), the Viggen is definitely oneā¦others might be the SEPCAT Jaguar, F-8 Crusader, SU-15 Flagon, Yak-38, etc.
It will be interesting what āmainlineā aircraft are produced/announced vs ānicheā aircraft. Personally, Iād like them all.
I wonder why RAZBAM hasnāt looked at doing an A-7. Iām sure not an easy port from FSX, however, they did have a 3 volume set of A-7 variants so they had done the research. ā¦plus they did the AV-8 for both FSX and DCSā¦ more
No argument from meā¦
I could not believe that anybody would put that much time and effort in a SwAF aircraft, that never saw use outside Sweden. Itās not where I would put my money, if I wanted to make sure I got a solid return on my investment.
But thatās whatās so great about the module. Itās a labour of love, and it shows.
That said, I think it has sold pretty wellā¦
They will make a killing with the next module though.
Talk about going from one extreme, to another!
I gotta say that looks like a beautiful plane. Love the reflection of the burner on it
Man Iām gonna enjoy the heck out of that
Somewhat related:
I havenāt flown the Mirage 2000 in a while (more than a year) and I donāt own the Harrier.
Are those still being worked on? Or are they feature complete and/or bug free already?
I am asking because I would be a tad reluctant to buy a plane from a developer who has that much on their plate. Who knows how long it would take to get into a good state?
Background for that: I jumped on the M-2000 when it was released and learned all that stuff
ā¦only to then re-learn everything because what looked fairly far along really wasnāt and quite some procedures changed.
I donāt have the time for that, so Iād like to not do that again. Which is why I am reluctant to buy early access planes now.
I donāt mind a bug here or there, or minor systems not getting implemented, but with the Mirage Razbam took it a bit too far for my taste.
Both of those planes are slated for significant work.
The Mirage is being redone based on feedback from French armed forces. This is happening now. Then they move onto the Harrier for missing systems. Evidently they hired a new programmer and gave him/her the Harrier. Iām sure it will take awhile to get up to speed on that codeā¦
Thanks, Iāll rather wait a bit then, as I am not that interested in the MiG-19 in the first place.
Iād imagine the 19 is less complex given the age of the platform, so more likely to hit straight bugs rather than procedural overhauls, but Iām going to wait too.
I only got the Mirage and Harrier last summer, but I donāt play around with the Mirage much because the CAP and interception missions donāt draw me in quite like CAS and strike. I do find the Mirage a lot of fun to play around with, but I end up relying on the guns more than anything.
The Harrier hasnāt seen a ton of huge updates from last summer but itās seen a lot of small fixes here and there. Itās not what Iād classify as complete, though. Still, probably the most fun module for me, simply due to the versatility.
Iām adopting a āwait and seeā approach to the MiG-19 because itās not really a grail aircraft for me and thus far thereās no bonus for being an early adopter. If thereās a discount for the first week of purchase, I might hop on, but otherwise Iāll wait and see what others have to say about it before jumping onto it. Once again, the mission the Farmer performs isnāt super interesting to me, and itās kinda outta place for our little world.