Considerations and Ruminations on the Early Access Model

citation needed.

because I like the quote. :slightly_smiling_face:

2 Likes

From a “house cleaning”: aspect, I’d like to see some mods, like the Mig-21, as having closed EA. It’s kind of a “waiting for the other shoe to drop” thing. That’s all. :slightly_smiling_face:

1 Like

Didn’t know myself
 Heard it at a lecture on organizational culture, some years ago.

Quote investigator has the skinny on this.

Yes!!!

9 Likes

I’ve never had patience for the “it’s not a game, it’s a simulator!!” ragers because it smacks of elitism. It’s another way of saying “I’m too good to play games, I’m using this because it’s better than that and learning it makes me superior to other people!”

Simulators other than professional ones are entertainment software. Which is also the definition of a computer game.Own up to your interests and hobbies. Has any CEO or politician ever raged that they don’t “play” golf because it’s not a game? Of course not. Golf is a game. Poker is a game. The people who make more money and have more power than us have no trouble admitting they play them.
Il-2 and DCS are as well. They can be difficult to learn and obscure to those without the interest, but they’re still games.

When it comes to competition, though, this is what all entertainment companies are dealing with now. DCS just doesn’t compete with Il-2 or BMS. It doesn’t just also compete with FSX. It’s not also just competing with any other game on a PC. It’s not also just Xbox and PS and Switch and other gaming systems. It’s not also just mobile or tablet games.
It’s Netflix.
It’s TV.
It’s the theater.
It’s concerts.
It’s anything and everything people do after work, on weekends, holidays, and vacations.

How people spend their time and money when they’re not working is in a massive state of flux right now, and everyone is scrambling to attract those consumer dollars. ED doesn’t only have to worry if their P-51D is better than one in Il-2 or FSX or P3D, but they have to make sure enough people think spending their weekend flying THEIR P-51 is better than streaming another season of Outlander or seeing the Foo Fighters in concert or going to the beach or whatever to make that investment worthwhile.

Controlling costs and maximizing revenue has never been as tough as it is now because there are no golden children for investors to throw money at anymore. VR didn’t do it, the cost is still too high. Mobile has its niche but the glory days of Farmville and Angry Birds have passed. Xbox and PS have moved from being mainstream to called niche by the media! If playing Call of Duty on an Xbox 1 is now “niche”, where does that put DCS? At the edge of a Venn diagram with a circle so small you need a scanning electron microscope to see it


4 Likes

Wow. That was good!

1 Like

I’m curious on when/where that occured. From everything I’ve seen console gaming is about as mainstream as netflix these days (referring to COD and FIFA for example).

1 Like

Great post!

You forgot curling in your list of entertainments DCS is competing with though.

And competitive sheep shearing. :slight_smile:

2 Likes

You’ve been waiting a looong time for that opportunity, haven’t you? :smirk:

2 Likes

I don’t care what “the media” calls niche or not.
If it’s not mainstream, it’s niche
?
Having a cockpit, in your home, donning a VR display unit and grabbing your HOTAS, that’s niche! :wink:

Precisely.
Which means that we won’t see a competitor bringing a product to the market that will satisfy the needs and wants of the DCS users.

I hope the one we got, survives


6 Likes

Absolutely! :smiley:

It happened around the time that mobile gaming brought in its first billion.

The ability to play games that draw people in on their iPad/phone/whatever that they can take with them in the car, on the bus, on the train, wherever instead of having to be nailed to the living room TV is a big draw.

The console gamers were relabeled “hardcore gamers” as the Angry Birds/Farmville crowd became the casual gamers. Yet even some of those casual gamers spend more than any of us do on sims.

When was the last PC-only game that they made a film about? By my reckoning, it was Wing Commander over 20 years ago.
There have been not 1 but TWO Angry Birds films, even though the 2nd failed to make money.

A lot of people play console games, yes, but they pale in comparison to the number using Android or iOS to play them.

World of Warcraft I guess.

2 Likes

I hate the current early access model, but I also just pre purchased the F-16.

4 Likes

caught1

4 Likes

Well written. I respectfully disagree.

The way I look at the world, there are games, hobbies and work. Games are activities for which you play and keep some sort of score (points, leveling up, beating opponents, etc.). Hobbies are pastimes for which just doing the hobby brings enjoyment. Work is an activity for which you get paid. (Thus, in my mind, getting paid to participate in a game, becomes work; i.e. professional athletes.)

I do not have an elitist attitude about my flight simulation hobby. I sort of just fell into it as the output of my previous hobby, making model airplanes, was literally destroyed after a couple of Permanent Change of Station (PCS) moves in the Navy. Having your entire hobby on a hard drive (backed up onto a few CDs) is much more conducive with having to undergo a PCS move every two to three years.

I also play games–real and electronic–such as golf (golf clubs actually survive PCS moves quite well), softball, racket ball, FPS’s, RTS’s, etc. I have no compunction against saying I play computer games. I just do not include flight simulators as games that I play.

I argue that the word “entertainment” covers a wide spectrum that, as @JediMaster points out, covers everything from games through movies, music and TV shows. I put hobbies in the “entertainment spectrum” as it were. That said, I disagree that a hobby such as flight simulation competes with much of that spectrum. As evidence this forum, @Aginor participates in the flight simulation hobby, but also enjoys watching–being entertained by–watching NFL football. Likewise there are threads for music, and movies / TV. None of these entertainment activities seem to really compete with the flight simulation hobby any more than other aspects of life–home, work, families–compete with it.

Just because I see the world as games, hobbies and work, doesn’t mean that everyone does or should see things that way too. I think it is obvious that MS sees flight simulation as a game–always has and probably always will. In a way that is good because I doubt they would put any effort into flight simulation if it were “just a hobby”; the 21st century equivalent of building model train sets.

It appears that this viewpoint is held by other flight simulation developers like ED. I think that many of ED’s design decisions are made with an eye towards the “gaming” aspects of DCS World, specifically ensuring and enhancing MP capabilities. (As stated above, one of my criteria for a game is keeping score–beating opponents.) If thinking of flight simulation as a game, and developing gaming aspects into it, keeps these companies in business and keeps me virtually flying, I certainly do not object.

However, to me, it is a hobby :slightly_smiling_face:

4 Likes

This.

I had some money. I could either buy oculus VR controllers to unlock a whole library of VR games and stuff and clunkily interact with the DCS cockpits, or I could buy PointCTRL, which only works to interact with DCS, but does that very well. Guess what I bought.

For me a PC is a machine that runs a flight simulator. All other things it can do (browse the web, play games, watch pr0nNetflix are bycatch.

One cares differently about a hobby than about a game.

2 Likes

Lot’s of semantics going on here. You could say that PC gaming is my hobby, with an emphasis on flight simulators. Building a new machine, keeping it updated, getting the performance needed out of it is all very hobbyesque.

I guess hobby has an element of work that you enjoy. Thus any game that has extended rules or intricate controls to master could be a hobby.

I agree with @JediMaster point that DCS completes with all the other things you can spend that “enjoyment” time on, time being a limited resource. Will I watch the football match or will I fly a Spitfire?

2 Likes

When my wife says, “Are you off to play that game again?” I say, “It’s not a game, it’s a sim!”

hahahahahaha

And when she catches me in the middle of mission editing, it’s, “Are you playing that game again?” I say, “I am not playing that game, I am working!”

6 Likes

Why do I not spend as much time in DCS as I would like?

Because I’m watching a movie with my kids.
Because I’m eating dinner with the family.
Because I’m streaming episodes of that show I haven’t seen in 25 years.
Because I was reading my Gordon book on the Flanker.
Because I was flying an Hs129 over the steppe strafing tanks.
Because I was playing Borderlands 3 with a friend.
Because I was racing in Monaco in the rain.
Because I was watching Wags do an ILS approach in the Viper.
Because it was just one of those days when I couldn’t sit and do it.

That’s why I swore off adversarial games online about 15 years ago. No matter how much time I’m going to spend on something, there are a lot of people who can spend more because they will spend every one of their spare minutes on it. So I will be outclassed, and I will not enjoy it. So I play offline or coop MP only now.
I have multiple interests outside combat flight sims, and I’m not willing to give any one of them up in favor of another. So when a DCS module comes out like the MiG-19 that looks fairly interesting, I have to say to myself “will I have the time to dedicate to this that makes spending $XX worth it?”

3 Likes