Would people like to do the non-flying roles? Make the non-flying roles free2play and I guess yes.
So the owner of the multiseat aircraft will pay for both seats.
Keep in mind that both the '58 and the '64 have dual controls, so itās not really so much non-flying as it is non-PIC. But I donāt know if DCS has control handoff or anything like that.
1 Like
I believe the L-39s do.
1 Like
For Gazelle, I think it does, as the āAā key by default claims āPilot in Controlā. Hilarity sometimes ensues of course, when itās not expected. 
This is for sure great in case both owns the module so both can fly it in multicrew.
But in case somebody will not own it will be cool if the guy could jump in and do the non-flying role for you. Like the dual controls would be disabled in that case.
1 Like
I think the āfree seatā idea is ok if the role isnāt that demanding, as in if you were a Huey gunner or something I could see it. Where you have to act as a weapons officer and learn a bunch of systems to be proficient then I tend to think that the other person should probably just buy the module. If you are prepared to put hours into something then it stretches the āit should be freeā bit for me personally.
Iād normally expect that the PIC would be able to yield and take control at will. Can make for fun times in an online game, but accidents have happened in the '64 community over who has control of the aircraft. For the '58, all you need is a ādope slapā button.
Thereās actually a greater amount of workload in operating the systems than there is in flying, so maybe flying it should be free instead! But then you have to have a CP/G who paid for it to be able to blow stuff up. 
Awesome choice, hopefully weāll be able to shoot M4ās out the door in VR!
(removed NSFL video - hope you understand)