My only gripe with SRS is having to configure so many profiles for the aircraft. Not to fault SRS at all. It’s just part of the territory. My mic switch in the A-10 is the wing sweep switch in the F-14, and my mic switch in the F-14 is my coolie hat in the A-10…and then I need to dual-purpose the one mic switch for both SRS and in-game comms…oof.
Concur. This relates to why I prefer generic sticks/throttles, with lots of ‘admin’ buttons/knobs/levers. A replica is cool for sure but there are just some add-on gizmos that require, to me, some extra HOTAS inputs.
exactly my words! where is my F100? F104? MiG17? MiG21F13? Mystere IV? Super Mystere? Meteor? Hunter? ![]()
EA for F-18 / F-16 is almost never ending … but ask people if they wants F-22 / F-35 / Su-57 which will never leave EA by design … they will pre-order it now even it is not yet in development by ED!
People wants the modern stuff, not the stuff which will leave EA sooner imo.
OK, I got excited there a little
ED lets finish the Korea first! ![]()
https://redstarsimulations.com/
These are your guys! Currently working on the first MiG you mentioned and this is the broader plan:
Focus
Red Star Simulations will be focused on 1st thru 3rd Generation fighter and attack planes from the Soviet Union, Britain, France, and United States
Regarding SRS. I have dedicated a mini-stick on my throttle for comms, and nothing else. So it doesn’t matter what I am flying, from Bf109 to F-18, from IL2 to DCS, forward stick is xmit on comm one, right is two and so on. Of course in order to do that, one must have the luxury on an unused stick or hat.
Regarding SRS, I use the rockers on my MFDs which otherwise wouldn’t see much use either. I think that SRS is a fantastic piece of software and I’m thankful to its authors but it would be amazing to have the comms integrated in the game rather than requiring a secondary set up and have it integrated with the normal comms, such as with AI and ATC, as well.
Looks like a Wespe to me
Wespe has a smaller bore, longer barreled gun: