Microsoft Flight Simulator - Post launch impressions

Going from a i7 6700k to a 5900X gave me a bigger than 100% performance boost. I am seriously impressed.

MSFS 2020 not only runs a lot smoother but also looks much nicer at the same time.

1 Like

For me it’s the other way around. I like to explore the world in MSFS every now and then but I always end up flying DCS. I guess civilian flying just doesn’t appeal to me as much.

3 Likes

I am surprised about it actually.
I used to be like that, too.

I will say the Mach Loop in the MB-339 is a hoot, great sense of speed. Throw in a little cloud cover if you really want to up your experience.

2 Likes

Planning on checking it out tomorrow.

I’m trying to get back into DCS after a long hiatus. The VR seems to be working really well, and I’m not sure if it’s the shaders mod, sticking to the driver 457.30 like glue or WMR improvements but it feels great. My impressions after a few months were interesting, and not what I expected:

  • The cockpits look fantastic
  • The scenery looks awful, like very basic
  • The flight model feels fantastic, much better than anything I’ve play in stock MSFS so far (then again, the price comparison isn’t really fair).
  • It has weapons, so that’s nice. :slight_smile:

Comparing MSFS and DCS is a bit like ā€˜I want to walk outside for a bit’ and then deciding if you want to play either Doom Eternal or Animal Crossing. For me they don’t really feel they have much in common, despite the bit about ā€˜flight’ overlapping.

I guess it depends on what you fly as well. Nearly all my time is spent in the A320NX mod, staring at a slide rule and 1000 buttons, trying to program the flight computer. :slight_smile: I did a quick VR flight in the Cub with a strong cross wind on new Out Skerries airstrip and it felt pretty good.

5 Likes

I’m mostly flying the Cessna’s (steam gauges) or the Cub and they do feel alright and are fairly detailed and their slow speed really lets you enjoy the scenery which to be clear looks amazing in areas with photogrammetry. On the other hand the scenery is not consistent and even in the detailed areas it can look very inconsistent down low which DCS actually does really well on the new maps like The Channel and Syria.

But in the end I don’t feel like I achieved anything in MSFS which is something I always enjoy about DCS.

I’ll probably never get into tube liners, just not something I enjoy but yeah, flying around in the Cub or Skyhawk is really nice every now and then.

1 Like

Yep, agree. DCS has a ā€˜mission’ and MSFS just sort of stares back and says ā€˜What?’ - I think I only gravitated to the tubes because it’s system/procedure based so sort of feels like a mini-game in itself.

The only other time I think I enjoyed just putting around was in multiplayer with @BeachAV8R and @Fridge, in that it was fun to go as a group and just land in postage stamp airfields (I think we did South Africa and then the Philippines). I know a lot of people enjoy the cargo ā€˜meta games’ over the civ stuff.

Actually, speaking of that time @BeachAV8R @Fridge - this sort of look familiar? I think we may have landed there?

3 Likes

:laughing: Good one.

Yeah, I need a ā€˜mission’ I guess, even if it’s only to see how close I can get my [manually dropped] iron near the bullseye; stick my thing in a a thing, smoothly; not muck up my trap. And do it all very fast at tree-top level.

I guess I don’t care as much how real the ground ā€˜clutter’ is as much as how it makes it all feel. And I still can’t run FS2020 in VR smooth enough. When that day comes I’ll crack it open again.

Looking forward to running various VR/IR-Routes in something with a pointy nose that has a good flight model.

I recall, years ago, myself and a buddy were running trails bikes in the middle of nowhere out west. We notice something moving, really fast. below us: a Viper on a VR route. He does the inverted ridge crossing thing about 2k’ below us (we were on top of a 13k’ mountain). We look at each other and, together, agreed, ā€œNaw, that ain’t work. Can’t call that workā€. Envious. He was gone in about 60 seconds.

I’m sure someone will release a quality, single-seat, fast-jet soon enough.

2 Likes

Some news on the weird flaps bug that came with the UK update.

The summary seems to be, go edit the config file and we plan to update early in March.

Is that a single file to edit or does each aircraft have it’s own?

I think each have their own. The premium ones will be locked unfortunately. The mod’d ones like the FBW A320NX have already been tweaked.

Example path:

C:\MSFS\Official\OneStore\asobo-aircraft-c172sp-as1000\SimObjects\Airplanes\Asobo_C172sp_AS1000\flight_model.cfg

lift_coef_flaps = 0.33790

goes to something like divided by 2, so

lift_coef_flaps = 0.16895

I think that’s it anyway.

Thanks Fearless!

1 Like

No worries, the instructions on the official forum are not great - I was kind of curious to see if there was an easy way, and it looks like people have some better tuned drag/drop mods for the stock aircraft anyway - this might work just as well as it resets those figures anyway:

https://flightsim.to/discover?s=flight%20model%20mod

ā€œLandedā€ā€¦I recall being too hot at one of those strips and just zipping off the endā€¦ā€œlalalala…look at meeeeeeeeeā€¦ā€

3 Likes

Dissapointment of the day: formation flying…

As you might have seen in the MSFS Screenshot threat I went out with a bunch of buddies from my squadron to check out the UK and it really looks awesome. However, coming from DCS I’m very used to flying in close formation and what became clear very quickly is that Asobo never considered that because when I tried to get a nice and tight formation going to make some screenshots we quickly ran into the issue of the dissappearing aircraft. Huge bummer because we all thought that there was still plenty of room to tighten it up but oh well…

1 Like

Well, you had to be really close to each other since the airplanes start disappearing when they ate about to collide (unless Asobo changed the logic).

Sorry Back Up GIF by Bellator

1 Like

Nah, it already starts in the screenshot I posted. There’s plenty of room left.

Edit:
We planned on doing something like this:

It simply didn’t work :worried:

The last update also caused an error in the autogen, it seemingly replaces all tennis courts with pretty large buildings that have orange roofs.

Does anyone know whether that was reported already?

Can you imagine how hilarious it would be if someone managed to swap out resources (or calls for objects I guess is how it works based on the overlay data?) - I would replace every water tower with the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man…

puft1

4 Likes