Private Aircraft Lands At Closed RAF Base

There are no words. You would think someone with a PC12 would know better. This has caused a right ruckus

https://ukaviation.news/private-aircraft-lands-at-closed-raf-base/

3 Likes

Alternative wording… :wink:

3 Likes

I completely agree, the implication i meant being he had a slightly more advanced aeroplane than the warrior and motorglider crowd.
I have heard that he is a CPL holder not a PPL as reported. The dork.

2 Likes

Reading the story it seems like he doesn’t care about any authority and just does as he pleases. One of those pilots that deserves to be strung up on the highest CAA tree that can be found.

5 Likes

Oh they will. The RAF really do not F#%k around with this stuff. I’ll be keeping a close eye on this

5 Likes

43dig9

6 Likes

Just because you can afford to fly, doesnt necessarily mean you should be allowed to…
lots of private owners unfortunately fall under this category & are all too often so used to getting their way
that the ‘rules do not apply to them’ mindset results in scenarios like this one.

hope gets torn a new one with a massive bill for his stunt

@Victork2 please keep us updated

4 Likes

True. But as he must have a pilots license (or have even more trouble) he can’t hide behind ”didn’t know” as he must have proven that he did know… :wink:

exactly

The world is full of rich people with licenses not to give a F. This sort of thing happens all the time–less with military bases, which is why I guess it made the news. People do dumb stuff because they can and because they don’t particularly care about the repercussions. I once had the unfortunate job of flying Citation charters for a sock company that needed worship at the alter of Walmart twice a month. We’d sit in the office staring at the wall for 10 hours until they were ready to head back. The staff at Bentonville, AR had countless stories of the crap Sam Walton, their founder, would pull–just because he was rich and well-connected. Reportedly he flew into ATL unannounced…more than once! I think the FAA had to eventually tell him to cool it or they might take action.

5 Likes

Yeah, I hear you.

A case I nearly mentioned the other day when we were talking about the Aero Commander’s reputation in South America. I with held because of irrelevance, but it does fit here. I worked for several years for a company that had started in the 1970’s as a flight school, became a charter operation with an Aero Commander and Super King Air, mostly for the oil companies in the Amazonic area, and finally became a local airline. I joined them as they were becoming an airline, and they were phasing out the charters (they kept the school going, but that’s another story).

A certain member of the CEO’s family had an executive post, but also had a license. He would fly a charter occasionally to “de-stress”, so to speak. One charter appealed to him, probably because it was one of the few international Ops, and he grabbed it. It involved flying to some airport in Colombia (cannot remember which) to pick up some spare for an oil company. He took the Aero Commander. On the way back, Quito closed due to a storm. His alternates were Latacunga and Guayaquil, which were international airports, but he opted to go straight to Coca instead, which was not international.

There was, of course, a great complaint from the Authority (he had ignored ATC repeately warning him not to land at Coca), but in the weeks that followed nothing earth-shattering ever came of it, strangely. The aircraft was confiscated for a brief while upon arrival (not even a week, IIRC), and I think he got a suspension, as he did not fly for a couple of months afterwards. He remained as impertinent as ever. LOL!

I am glad, I must say, that I never flew for their charter Ops, as at the time I was busy with an admin post putting together their statistics and revenue management departments, preparatory for the airline.

2 Likes

If memory serves, this stuff used to happen kinda regularly before all the fancy digital stuff. Heck, this flight sim thing has shown me just how easy it is to not even find the place you want to land.

Miss-id’s: Was working a sector once (I was actually training) that was primarily military traffic. Lot going on. Some foreign nationals in F-16’s were training in air refueling.

The AR was “interesting” due to, a) trainees in the Vipers and, b) the language issues. Cleared one in to the AR track and such…but there just happened to be an AWACS passing a little ways away, and well below the track. Foreign Viper driver gets all the “stuff” correct, then proceeds to dive through the track and suckle up to the AWACS.

He’s off freq and I’m watching my instructor get a little sideways. So things start ‘flashing’ (alarms) and I say, “Hey, I’ll bet he thinks the AWACS is the tanker!”. Bingo. Probably akin to Navy drivers landing at the wrong boat?

When he got close enough to realize something was ‘missing’ he bolted right back up and comes back on with, “Say again ceen-ter?”. Best part was, as a trainee, I didn’t have to fill out the paperwork!

3 Likes

This actually happens fairly regularly at the Army post in my AO. The post runway is about 10 miles away from the municipal airport and as a result it was actually pretty common to see a light plane coming in for landing on post.

Well the airforce do it the other way round sometimes as well :rofl:

5 Likes

I think it is pretty cut and dried that the pilot should have done their research before making the flight to avoid this sort of screw up. However, there are a few factors that make this sort of thing disturbingly easy to do here in the UK, so I’m going to play devils advocate for a minute or two:

(DISCLAIMER: I do not have a pilots license - it’s on my to do list - just a healthy interest in the subject, so there is a real possibility I could be barking up the wrong tree here).

  • Quite a few RAF bases handle civilian traffic as well as military, and often on some sort of part-time schedule. It is not necessarily obvious where to find this information (more on this below). For example, Biggin Hill has technically been military only since 1997 (I think?) but you can still charter flights out of there and there are still a number of private planes / flying groups resident there.
  • There are a variety of sources publishing aerodrome information (NATS, CAA, AIP, Jeppeson etc), and in many cases they don’t include all the information you might need. Aerodromes also publish local procedures on their own websites. So there is no centralised source of aerodrome operation information, which can make flight planning tricky.
  • The article does mention that the aerodrome operates on a “prior permission required” system, however this is not unusual in the UK. There was a survey a few years ago that showed over 90% of all aerodromes in the UK state this either on their website, in their operating procedures, or in the AIP. Needless to say there is still a fair bit of traffic that doesn’t phone ahead for PPR and it’s pretty rare to be turned away.
  • Incidentally, not all airfields in the UK have entries on the AIP (in fact most don’t). Aerodromes can exist without being licensed as such. Many of the popular smaller fields operate without a licence (less hassle and less expense). For example North Weald, which has an enormous tarmac runway, is home to a large number of private aircraft / businesses, and even hosts an Air Ambulance Helicopter pad, does not qualify for a licence and does not appear in the AIP.
  • ATC provision in the UK is really only geared to corporate / airline IFR traffic. Provision of ATC for private pilots operating VFR outside of controlled airspace is at the discretion of the ATC operators. In most cases at most they will afford either ‘basic’ or ‘traffic’ services, which at best amounts to them offering to supply relevant information on your flight when they feel like it. Even if they offer a ‘deconfliction’ service, the level of service is nothing like the American ‘flight following’. Also, it is the responsibility of the individual aerodromes to provide tower radio services for traffic within their ATZ, and many smaller fields have towers that are either completely unmanned or only manned at certain times. It is therefore not unusual for pilots to get used to conducting flights without much radio contact with ATC or the destination aerodrome.

So to sum up, planning a private flight in the UK is fraught with pitfalls because of the disjointed way that services and aerodromes are managed. So I do have a bit of sympathy for the pilot’s mistake, although the decision to leave even though he had been specifically told not to is going to come back to haunt him I suspect.

As always, I could be very wrong.

2 Likes

To be fair to the “Zoomies”…and you know it pains my Navy-heart to do so…at least they were trying to land at MacDill AFB and mistook this small uncontrolled GA airfield (whose runway is aligned with MacDill’s runway a few miles to the west…but much shorter…and on the other side of Tampa Bay…) as MacDill AFB…home to both CENTCOM and SOCOM, both huge commands…hmmm…maybe I don’t want to be far to the Zoomies after all. :grimacing:

I’ve flown in and out of RAF Valley a number of times in the FSX world. With ORBX’s Wales scenery it is a great place to start out for the Mach Loop or just enjoy western Wales.

That’s a difficult one. I have on the odd occasion (normally when I’ve departed too early to call them) asked for ppr over the radio and been a little bit cap in hand about “forgetting” and it’s been fine but I would NEVER ever do it somewhere where the RAF own the place.
This whole thing just reeks of arrogance from the pilot. Especially as it was in wales which is in full lockdown still. I am extremely wary of people like this. He is one digit on a radio frequency out from landing on top of something on a runway
“Huh nobody on frequency, biggest global event shutting down society and airfields all over the country, no PPR, RAF property, obviously I’m safe to land here.”

The man is a fool

Ok, I didn’t know it was that bad. Many years since I last visited England in a cockpit…
But still. If there are that many pitfalls, it’s even more important to tread carefully!
If I were to land somewhere without two-way radio comms with an ATC unit, I’d be damn sure I was allowed to do so.

1 Like

Absolutely. This. 100%

To be fair it probably isn’t and I’ve probably overstated it a bit, but it’s easy to imagine a pilot growing complacent with non-communicating aerodromes etc.

© 2020 Mudspike.com | Articles Website | Forums Rules & FAQ