Also I’d like to say I got to sleep for six hours, come back and this thread is fabulous. Good Job Europe!
That F-108 looks like the illegitimate child of an F15 and Concorde. I can’t tell if I’m intrigued or disturbed.
Note the time-stamp on the first picture: The design predates both and is more like the XB-70’s mean, marathon runner little brother.
It’s coming…
The F111[quote=“wagmatt, post:86, topic:3314, full:true”]
It’s coming…
[/quote]
See?
Check time stamp. F111 was first… as it should be
Look at the message I quoted. It’s in there. You removed it.
'nuff said.
Just to be clear, the MiG-19 does not have a DCS license agreement at this time. Hopefully it will in the future if the developer (a sub-team working with RAZBAM) can demonstrate the level of quality needed. It simply does not conflict with already established plans, as the MiG-23 did.
OMG! It’s confirmed! MiG23 is somewhere over the Rainbow!
…unlike the F111…
@wagmatt please forgive our humble giggling and joking. It’s all in good humor and with no intent of disrespect or misleading Eagle Dynamics work.
No worries. Sorry we can’t say much more, but we have agreements we have to abide by.
Oh oh! But of course good Sir!
It’s actually amazing to have a conversaton with you, Sir.
And for what it’s worth, keep up. I love DCS!
Not to be fishing here, because its good to have Wags around but… I thinks he meant the Jug is coming. That would make perfect sense.
BTW, this is now becoming a circus of coming soon. I guess unless ED says its coming… Its liable to not even be close. Look at all the aircraft we were promised so
long ago. Meteor, Fury, Vampire. I do believe we will see some new stuff in 2017. Well, I hope…
The situation is fully acknowledged, but it’s hard to think how else to refer to the situation. Perhaps we should call this incident… the rogue module?
I find this interesting because most of the time I find such exacting emphasis on vocab exhausting. But I’m currently reading through about ten pages of reddit meltdown where six people read the same statement syllable for syllable and come to six wildly divergent conclusions, and I can’t help but feel @SkateZilla’s got a point.
Good idea. It was the first one, so how about ‘rogue one’ to make the sequence clearer?
Yes, the P-47. Has been on the DCS: WWII list from the start.