Read It / Do It #01: North American X-15

@x15gal welcome to Mudspike! I am sure Beach will get back to you on this. How did you find Mudspike if I may ask?

1 Like

As usual, my work and projects piled up and I did not get back to you…let me look around!

Thanks for your patience…

1 Like

Hello @x15gal - I did come across your book a bit late in my research for the X-15 article. I’m going to order your book today! Perhaps I can write a follow up ā€œRead It - Do Itā€ based on some of your findings!

So all the images from the flight simulator (X-Plane) were captured by me yes…the charts and stuff were pulled from the book that was the ā€œRead Itā€ portion of the article (Dennis Jenkins’ X-15 Frontiers Of Flight).

X-Plane and my slightly modded X-15 did a pretty good job of following the flight profile and characteristics for a desktop/consumer flight simulator. It is even more fun when flying them in VR (Virtual Reality). The speed and pace of some of those flights is just breathtaking (10 or so minutes from drop to landing).

I’m going to order it today and dive in…I’ll let you know what I think!

That is a really unique experience - and I’m absurdly jealous! A year or so ago I picked up a print signed by Joe Engle…so that is one of my treasures. My dream would be to someday sit in the cockpit of the plane, but I’m sure it is off-limits to all but the most dedicated restoration and preservation team members. I’d also like to visit the Mike Adams memorial in the future.

Pretty much anytime I fly a trip out to the southwest I’m always looking down trying to spot the various dry lake beds enroute. Some still have the faintest markings of those thick tar markings on them. Really cool to see that history…and even though my plane only flies at ~ 40-45,000’ it still is a neat perspective on what some of the X pilots were seeing.

What did you think of Ryan Gosling’s portrayal of Neil Armstrong’s X-15 days? A bit embellished on the ā€œatmosphere skipā€ flight…but the movie was pretty good.

Thanks for the link to your site - I’ll enjoy going through it. I’m sure it is in the book, but what got you interested specifically in the X-15 history?

4 Likes

One other thing…as an X-15 aficionado, you might also enjoy the article I wrote a couple years ago about the more modern day sub-orbital flights that I tried to simulate:

I’m hoping to do a lifting body article whenever I can free up some time too…!

3 Likes

And it is on the way…! Delivery by tomorrow…?? Amazon must use an X-15… :rofl:

1 Like

When I see the big geese dropping down into our yard, I think of your ā€˜lifting body’ planed article!

1 Like

I happened across Mudspike from a Google search. I’m currently doing a major upgrade on my X-15 site, and the current page I’m working on has to do with the X-15 High Range, which includes the radar sites and emergency lakebeds. So, I was doing a search just to see what came up and it took me here. Glad I found it.

4 Likes

Thank you very much for getting a copy of my book. I look forward to hearing what you think about it.

I would love to have a flight sim for the X-15, but as far as I know, none of them run on a Mac, so I’ve been out in the cold in that regard. I helped out with images for one programmer many years ago for an X-15 flight sim.

You’re definitely right that the X-15 flights are amazingly fast. Normal mission time was about 10 minutes. The longest flight was Neil’s ā€œskipā€ flight on 20 April 1962 of 12 minutes and 28.7 seconds.

I was lucky to start my research and interviews back when 9 of the 12 pilots were still around. It is a terrible thing that only Engle is left with us today. And so many of the others who made the X-15 possible are gone as well. I hate it every time I have to update my interview list with the notation that someone else has passed away. Joe is an amazing guy, and I was thrilled when he accepted the idea of writing the Foreword for my book. Working with him over the years at things like our talks at the Air Force Academy or the panel I moderated at Spacefest a few years ago with him and others from the X-15 are definitely big highlights in my life.

I definitely hope that you get to visit the Mike Adams site at some point. We have done a lot of work out there over the years, and it is an amazing thing to see. I can’t think of any other crash memorial that has accomplished what the Adams site has been able to do. When you go to my web site, you’ll find links to download files such as my flight log. There are also links for the tour itinerary that I developed called ā€œIn the Footsteps of the X-15.ā€ Those files will give explicit directions on how to get to the various X-15 sites in California and Nevada, including the Mike Adams site. I’ll be doing an upgrade to those files in the coming months as I work through all the updates. I’ve been at this project for more than 6 months now, and have added about 1100 new photos so far.

As for ā€œFirst Manā€ I have to admit that I am not much of a fan of that movie. And I say that after being one of their technical advisors! I was very disappointed in how things were handled, especially with regard to the X-15. There are just so many things wrong that I won’t go into them now. If anyone’s interested in a full critique, I’d be glad to share it. And this is not just from a technical point of view, but the overall story as well. Neil was a really nice person, who was very generous and had a good sense of humor. When you come out of First Man you get the impression he was the most dour, depressed, and humorless of human beings. So, I’ll let it go at that for now.

Sorry to go on for so long. Appreciate you getting back with me.

9 Likes

I bought a copy on audible as well. The reviews speak for themselves. Looks a great piece of work.

Not something to worry about, here at Mudspike!
Experience and knowledge are appreciated without limitations!
Also, welcome!

3 Likes

Thank you for the link to your article about SpaceShip2. I’ll definitely check that out. When giving my X-15 talk at Scaled Composites several years ago, one of the ways that I was ā€œpaidā€ for my services is that I got to ā€œrideā€ the SS2 simulator into space. Now that was an exhilarating experience, to say the least! And at least it didn’t cost $250,000. :slight_smile:

5 Likes

Please elaborate as much as you want, we live for that stuff here!

1 Like

Indeed. Please do, Michelle! We enjoy long reads and good stories! The sim that BeachAV8R used is called X-Plane and that should also run on Mac computers. You can download a free demo from their website to see if it works.

1 Like

Okay, here goes with my diatribe about ā€œFirst Man.ā€

Overall impressions:

Often, when I first watch a movie and have a negative reaction to it, I will go back at a future point and watch it again to see if I was missing something. With that in mind, I find that many times I actually ā€œgetā€ a movie that I dismissed the first time around, and can appreciate what they were trying to accomplish. I have now seen ā€œFirst Manā€ three times, and I have to admit that I actually like it less each time I have seen it. That has never happened before in my movie going experience. Maybe it’s because I am too close to the subject matter because of knowing Neil and because of my passion for the X-15 and space exploration in general. I’ll leave that for you to decide.

I feel that they did a huge disservice to who Neil was, and skewed the facts to bend the movie to a narrative that simply was not based in reality. I have to say that I have zero problem with a movie maker changing facts in order to make a narrative point. A couple of great examples are ā€œApollo 13ā€ and ā€œThe Right Stuff.ā€ Both of these movies messed up on a lot of facts, but both movies did so in ways to make the story more coherent to the movie goer, especially in the limited time available. (The only exception to that is the depiction of Gus Grissom after his Mercury mission in ā€œThe Right Stuff,ā€ which was despicable when they gave the impression of him as ā€œthat squirming hatch blower.ā€)

With regard to ā€œFirst Man,ā€ look at the expectations before the movie came out. Almost all the press was about how this would be the movie to beat at Oscar time in pretty much all categories. Instead the movie totally tanked at the box office, earning just four Oscar nominations in minor categories, and only winning one for special effects. The audience saw this movie and understood intrinsically that it was not good. Making Neil into a dour and depressing figure, and focusing on the loss of his daughter, Karen, as the motivating factor in everything he did, served to alienate everyone who saw it from the wonder and excitement of the experiences that Neil had over his career in space exploration. It was a huge disservice to the memory of Neil.

Technical Difficulties:

Let me point out some of the technical errors. First off, yes there was a lot of vibration when on the wing of the B-52. In fact, it was noted by the crew the day of Neil’s X-15 skip flight (20 April 1962), that the turbulence was about the worst they had had on a flight so far. However, once he was off the shackles and on his way, that vibration would have been down to a much smaller level. Instead, we get vibration that, if real, would have shaken the pilot and the aircraft to pieces. Same goes for both the Gemini and Apollo launches as well. Looked like they were putting in about + and - 100 gs or so!

The X-15 never would have been launched in the heavy clouds that looked like rain. X-15 flights took place on days with relatively clear skies, and never with thick cloud cover. Also, this flight took place around noon, so the low light angles were bogus. The X-15 instrument panel did not have a rotating dial for altitude indication, so that was stupid. In addition, the altitude reached on that flight was 207,500 feet, not 140,000 feet as shown. Using the actual height would have made the scene not only more authentic, but also more dramatic. Neil also did not barely make it over the tree tops of the Mt Wilson area as depicted in the movie, as he headed back north to Edwards! In reality, at that point he was at about 45,000 feet.

The same goes for the terrible weather present on the scenes of the Apollo 11 launch as was wrong on the X-15 flight. They also used close up shots of the booster lifting off the pad that were all stock shots of the night launch of Apollo 17 rather than the early morning (and well-lighted) Apollo 11 liftoff. I could also complain about not getting the roll pattern correct on their Saturn V model, but that would just be nitpicking. :slight_smile:

How about the fact that, especially on the Gemini 8 mission, the instrument panel appeared to have gone through about 20 missions already. Everything was extremely dirty! Guenter Wendt (the Pad Leader) would never allow a new spacecraft to get messy like that.

There were aspects of the movie ā€œFirst Manā€ that reminded me of another movie, ā€œA Beautiful Mind.ā€ If you haven’t seen that, it is actually really excellent. However, it deals with a mathematician who is mentally ill, and he sees people who aren’t there. They were showing Neil in that same light where he was seeing Karen all over the place after her death. And the whole ā€œKaren’s braceletā€ thing was something that simply never happened. In fact Jan said to Jim Hansen (when he was researching for the book the movie is based on) that she was extremely pissed at Neil for not doing anything with regard to their children during the Apollo 11 mission. Throughout the movie, you can see how Jan gets very upset with Neil about his lack of feelings, and his lack of response to the loss of Karen, but then he supposedly takes Karen’s bracelet to the Moon. It is inferred when Neil comes back (although definitely not explicitly stated) that Jan knows what he did, and all is then okay. In the long run, and in reality, Jan cited his lack of dealing with Karen’s death as being one of the reason’s for their divorce even 30 years later. So the entire Karen angle was used as a fake story follow-through in order to make the filmmaker’s narrative work.

Conclusion:

The real story is plenty compelling and would have made an amazing and dramatic movie. It didn’t need all that made-up garbage from bad weather, to excessive vibration, to Karen’s bracelet being dropped into a crater in the Sea of Tranquility. They also neglected the simple fact that Neil actually did have a good sense of humor. He was stoic to those who didn’t know him, but was warm and friendly to those who were his good friends, especially those in aviation and space.

It’s been 25 years since the release of ā€œApollo 13.ā€ It is still regarded as a wonderful motion picture and a classic. People still get excited about it, even by those who are not ā€œin the knowā€ with regard to the space program. ā€œFirst Man,ā€ less than two years after its release, is already an almost unknown movie, and will never stand the test of time as ā€œApollo 13ā€ has done. The reason for that is that ā€œFirst Manā€ is just not a good movie.

Believe me when I say that I dearly wanted First Man to be not only good, but Great! It failed.

Hope I haven’t offended anyone in my comments about the movie, and would love to hear anything you’d like to share.

Michelle

11 Likes

Absolutely! You painted a very detailed picture of why the movie doesn’t work so I can only thank you.
I wanted to like it as well but I always felt I lacked (being a non-native English speaker) the terms to describe the feeling.

Now it seems more clear.

…
I know you’re not here @ Mudspike for this but- :stuck_out_tongue: You’ll discover I’m the cheesy guy- I’d like to ask what you thought of the movie Space Cowboys.

Yes, it’s absurd but… what did you think of it? (if you’ve seen it at all!)

Sryan, Thanks for the info. I was definitely not aware anything as made available for Macs. I’m downloading it now, and hopefully it will work on my system.

1 Like

I love ā€œSpace Cowboys.ā€ It’s a wonderful and fun movie. A bunch of old geezers get a chance to go back into space, what could be better!

That’s one of the huge things wrong in ā€œFirst Manā€ in that there was zero humor. Who wants to go to a movie to get depressed. The world can be enough of a downer already.

Glad you enjoyed what I wrote about the movie.

1 Like

That was a masterful review. I loved the movie. Now I hate it! Normally I am not nearly so flexible. My love was a reaction against those who, in my mind, were overly disappointed by the lack of a flag scene. But really they were right. Maybe not expressly about the lack of a patriotic and heart-tugging flag moment but about the general malaise of the film. I was too closed-minded to get where they were coming from. I did however know people here in New Jersey who had met Neil and they all agreed that he was a genuinely nice and outgoing guy. A pilot’s pilot.

1 Like

After waiting 45 minutes for the download, unfortunately, when I tried to open it, it won’t run on my system. Darn! I was getting excited there for a minute. Hopefully someday…

1 Like

Thank you for your comments about my review. I have to say that I’m sorry that it changed your mind to a negative review, but it should have been so much better!

Yes, there was a lot of controversy about the flag raising. My personal opinion was that that specific complaint made no real difference in my mind. If that had been the only major problem I could have justified liking it anyway by saying that the movie was about Neil rather than the country going to the Moon. So, on the basis of Neil’s story, that’s where it failed.

If you’re interested, I did an interview on David Livingston’s ā€œThe Space Showā€ just a few days after the movie’s premiere, and the movie was the primary topic we discussed.

https://www.thespaceshow.com/show/16-oct-2018/broadcast-3207-michelle-evans

1 Like