Top Gun: Maverick Trailer

Please,
Let me know when they start showing Cruise videos in 120FPS, 8KHDR12 on a 840" Screen w/ 18,000w Peak Audio across 65 Speakers.

LOL… I love that real pilots wrote this. ^-^
79 cringeworthy errors in ā€˜Top Gun’ - We Are The Mighty

1 Like

if they did everything by the book, it would not be a decent movie as they would not have been able to get 90% of the shots they wanted.

Well it’s not about that really- it’s mostly how the errors a person in-the-know can tell do make perfect sense to the average Joe.

Most of those indeed don’t bother me.
Such as the ridiculous hangar briefing or the maneuvers which they had to do that way to make the planes fit in the shot.

But for example Maverick using the throttle wrongly does. I know it is silly but it does. It makes me cringe hard.

5 Likes

I’m hip. I mean, how hard would it be to get it [more] right?

It’s always bugged me that Hollywood, when it comes to more ā€˜technical’-like topics in films, appears to think people are stupid - they dumb things down to the 8th grade level, keeping them stupid. This got really bad in the 70’s/80’s, with a very few exceptions.

Make airplane noises periodically throughout a film and the un-initiated (to aviation) will likely go, ā€œoh cool, airplaneā€. Replace that with something deeper and they might, just might, wonder, ā€œwhat did that mean?ā€. And then go find out - tweaked their curiosity - stimulated something more than just a base response.

The emotion feeds the dramatic; human interactions. When you overly-simplify the technical you essentially make all movies the same: [insert some airplane noises]…boy meets girl/things are good…[more airplane noises]…boy loses girl/things go bad…[insert some more airplane noises]…boy gets girl/things work out.

What’s that anecdote from TG1 again? Where (was it Dan Pederson? I forget - a real aviator) tried to ā€œkeep it from becoming a musicalā€. To which the director replied along the lines, ā€œI don’t make movies for fighter pilots, I make them for movie-goersā€. You can have both.

However, I am looking forward to the reviews of TG2 from this crowd, to see how Tom & company did.

2 Likes

Well he failed, Top Gun is pretty much a Rock Concerted from the Beginning to the End.

As someone who gets science, watching most SF films and shows leaves me shaking my head as they miss all sorts of things. It usually consists of me being pulled out of the moment, stating ā€œthat could never happenā€, and then willing myself back into immersion. There have been almost no instances I can recall where it hasn’t happened at least once.

I’m happy when people watching other sorts of shows get peeved when they miss accuracy.

2 Likes

Tough crowd. I mean, I watched Iron Eagle to the end…well it did have F-16’s in it

6 Likes

Just dont watch Iron Eagle, II, III, and IV

3 Likes

Why not? They are SO hilarious!

1 Like

Pretty much every American fighter pilot alive has seen TG*. They quote it constantly still. The film’s kitsch was the very thing that gave it such an enduring impact with that community. A technically correct film would probably have disappointed pilots just as much as it would the general movie-goer.

FWIW, TGM got a five minute standing ovation at Cannes.

*I can’t back that up. But I’ve yet to meet the pilot who hasn’t.

4 Likes

I am with you on that :slight_smile:

That is a completely unfounded generalization!

Now, anyone got the number to…

I think I might need that.

7 Likes

@Elby and i are going to start that company.
Specialist rubber dog turd movement from Hong Kong to miramar.

5 Likes

Brilliant! You’re going to be like the Steve Jobs of Dog Turds.

2 Likes

Also every bloody Airedale* I’ve ever met. As nauseam. No matter how unfunny or worn out the reference may be.

*Airedale: Navy types who work in aviation ratings, but usually aren’t flight crew.

1 Like

Kinda like ā€œAirplaneā€. Or ā€œPushing Tinā€ (ATC’s version of TopGun, ugh, but the quotes from it in control rooms flowed freely for a while). It’s all fun.

1 Like

Makes me wonder if I’m a little salty because I’ve only ever worked in careers that never have movies made about them (I can think of three Nukes in popular Hollywood movies, and don’t even get me started on the lack of engineers- insert long rant about Hollywood writers and all the career fields they don’t understand).

1 Like

I’m not gonna lie, I’m very greatful that there are not a bunch of movies about US Navy Nuclear disasters or that feature engineers doing engineer stuff.

There are a bunch (I can think of at least 3 off the top of my head) about Soviet nuclear sub disasters, for reasons…

That said, thank you for your service. I think everyone is very much aware that the boats don’t move (much less fight) without engineers and four dozen other ratings doing their jobs expertly.

ETA: I’m not .mil, but I know that I and my fellow pilots value and appreciate our line guys and MX personnel like they’re made of gold, because we can’t do our jobs without them doing theirs well.

2 Likes