So this weekend MAC is moving to the next level. With 40% reputation achieved (finally), it is time to retire the Cessna 185F (sniffle) and move into something larger. The testing process has touched on many aircraft weighing affordability vs. cargo load vs. operational ability:
-
Shorts Skyvan SC-7
-
Fokker F-27
-
Fairchild Metro
-
DHC-8-100 Dash 8
-
Dornier 328
-
DHC-600-300 Twin Otter
-
Do228
-
Grand Caravan
-
Quest Kodiak
What we are looking for is an ability to retain our short field capability because MAC is all about squeezing supplies into impossible spots. The rough field capability eliminated a few contenders. Others, that I really liked, just didn’t have the graphics/virtual cockpit that would make extended flying fun (I’m looking at you VirtualCol). In the end, I’ve narrowed it down to two aircraft: the Twin Otter and the Do228 - both proven rugged, short field performers with good load hauling capability.
To keep in somewhat balanced and equal - I adjusted the aircraft gross weights to allow for approximately two hours of range, then simply loaded weight to reach their maximum gross. Note - this does ignore real world maximum cargo weight limitations…some aircraft it doesn’t matter how much fuel you offload, they are still limited to a maximum pax/cargo load. As well, I know the Do228 will go FURTHER because it is FASTER on two hours of fuel, but we can adjust AH2 stage lengths in our preferences, so it isn’t so much about how FAR we go, but rather having enough fuel to go somewhere, shoot an approach, and find an alternate. In general, two hours is enough for our type of operations.
The Twin Otter comes in with the ability to carry 4,380 lbs. of cargo.
The Do228 comes in with the ability to carry 5,420 lbs. of cargo.
Our “Fly Off” competition will occur at the gorgeous ORBX Blue Canyon (KBLU) airport in the foothills of the Sierra Mountains in California. The high elevation (5,283) and short runway (3,300’) mirror the typical type of field we might find ourself flying into. We’ve contaminated the runway with some light snow, dialed in light winds, and the conditions will remain the same for both aircraft flights.
First we will take a look at the Twin Otter - coming in at $1,948,000.
The Twin Otter has a nice cargo carrying setting that the Do228 does not have…
A flap 20 takeoff will be conducted, with a static runup and brake release, rotation near Vmca…
Liftoff at this maximum gross weight occurs at 1,088’…
We fly a teardrop pattern around the valley to land the opposite direction (calm winds)…
A nice feature of the Twin Otter is that at full flap settings, it flies with a very nice nose down pitch attitude and can maintain a slow 70 knot approach speed with a great sight picture and without increasing speed - great STOL characteristics.
Nearly all turboprop modeling in FSX or P3D are terrible. The throttle response is just always lacking in these turboprops, and the Twin Otter is no exception. You can’t risk getting too slow because the engines don’t spool up the way they do in real life…so you have to fly with a little smidge of power in and on the better side by 5 or 10 knots of what you’d like to be doing.
Touchdown is near the bottom of the white arc on the airspeed indicator, on the threshold marking, followed by maximum braking, maximum reverse…the same technique is used for both aircraft.
Total landing run at maximum gross weight - a stunning 607’ - that will get us into pretty much any forestry strip or dirt hole cut out of the Idaho or Oregon back country…!
Now we move on to the $1,820,000 Do228. An absolutely stunning 3D model and cockpit…way more updated than the Twin Otter, and far more functional and convenient avionics.
Flaps “1” for takeoff according to all I’ve been able to find (which is not much)…
No cargo cabin option unfortunately…so we’d have to imagine those seats gone and replaced by boxes…
Same setup - on the threshold, hold max power, then brake release…
At max gross weight, the Do228 has a much longer ground run and required takeoff speed than the Twin Otter - taking 1,528’ vs the 1,088’ that the Twin Otter took.
Of course, once you raise the gear and get cleaned up, the Do228 will be much faster in climb, cruise, and descent with far less drag. And there is no comparing the avionics, the Do228 has a nice TAWS that would be very useful in MAC operations - and a more functional GPS, and pop-up autopilot controls…all very nice features.
Completing the teardrop and lining up on final…
At full flaps, the Do228 also has a nice pitch attitude for landing that allows for a great sight picture. Carried airspeed is a bit higher, but the airplane is very comfortable to fly.
Touchdown on the threshold, max braking, max reverse…
At max gross we use 1,037’ versus the Twin Otter’s 607’ showing…
The final results are pretty favorable for the Twin Otter. The performance in takeoff and landing are probably the most important factors over cruise speed and/or avionics. I mean, I can probably retrofit the Twin Otter with an updated offering like the Reality XP GTN. And the Twin Otter IS the quintessential Bush aircraft.
So with that poll bias established (LOL)…what say you Mudspikers?
- Aerosoft DHC-6 Twin Otter
- Carenado Do228
0 voters